Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials

Variability of outcome reporting in Hirschsprung's Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic review

General Information

Abstract:
Heterogeneity in outcome reporting limits identification of gold-standard treatments for Hirschsprung's Disease(HD) and gastroschisis. This review aimed to identify which outcomes are currently investigated in HD and gastroschisis research so as to counter this heterogeneity through informing development of a core outcome set(COS). Two systematic reviews were conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared surgical interventions for primary treatment of HD in review one, and gastroschisis in review two. Studies available only as abstracts were excluded from analysis of reporting transparency. Thirty-five HD studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 74 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was faecal incontinence (32 studies, 91%). Seven of the 28 assessed studies (25%) met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. Thirty gastroschisis studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 62 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was length of stay (24 studies, 80%). None of the assessed studies met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. This review demonstrates that heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a significant risk of reporting bias exist in HD and gastroschisis research. Development of a COS could counter these problems, and the outcome lists developed from this review could be used in that process.

Authors:
Allin, B. S. Irvine, A. Patni, N. Knight, M.

Publication

Journal:
Sci Rep
Volume:
6
Issue:
Pages:
38969 -
Year:
2016
DOI:
Further Study Information

Date:
Funding source(s):

Health Area

Disease Category
Gastroenterology

Disease Name
Hirschsprung's disease

Target Population

Age Range
0 - 100

Sex
Either


Nature / type of Intervention
Surgery

Method(s)

Systematic review

Stakeholders Involved

Unknown

Study Type

Systematic review of outcomes measured in trials

The site uses cookies, some may have been set already. Please refer to our privacy policy & cookie usage statement.
If you continue to use the site we'll assume you're happy to accept the cookies.