Towards a Core Outcome Set for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review of Outcomes Reported Following Intact and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Objective: To encompass the needs of all stakeholders and allow effective data synthesis from trials, registries, and other studies; a core outcome set for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is needed. In this first stage, the aim was to report the range, frequency, and time of pre-specified outcomes reported following AAA repair.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases 2010 - 2019 were searched using ProQuest Dialog™.

Review methods: The systematic review was reported to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA), PROSPERO registration CRD42019130119. Outcomes were coded using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy and presented separately for intact and rupture repairs, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair, and time from repair (acute < 90 days vs. = 1 year) (COMET Initiative 1582).

Results: For intact AAA and rupture repair, a total of 231 and 70 reports with 589 255 and 177 465 patients respectively were included: only 98 and 19 respectively provided = 1 year outcomes. Most studies were retrospective, with 13 randomised trials of intact AAA repair and five randomised trials of ruptured AAA repair. For intact AAA, the most common pre-specified COMET taxonomy outcomes were mortality (181), vascular complications (137), and re-intervention (52). EVAR studies dominated the vascular outcomes in acute and later time periods: excluding 47 reports from device registries, reduced vascular outcomes to 83. For ruptured AAA, the three most common outcomes were mortality (64), vascular (11), and hospital stay (10). The range of outcomes reported was wide with functioning outcomes reported from most randomised trials but few retrospective studies.

Conclusion: This review identifies the paucity of long term data and the disproportionate attention paid to vascular complications vs. patient functioning outcomes, this skew being accentuated by reporting from EVAR device registries. These data will inform focus groups, prior to a pan-European Delphi consensus, involving clinicians, patients, carers and providers, for developing core outcomes for repair of intact and ruptured AAA.

Contributors

Matthew Machin, Pinar Ulug, Kamashi Pandirajan, Matthew J Bown, Janet T Powell

Publication

Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: -
Year: 2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.009

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s):


Health Area

Disease Category: Heart & circulation

Disease Name: Abdominal aortic aneurysm

Target Population

Age Range: 50 - 120

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Surgery

Stakeholders Involved

Study Type

- Systematic review of outcomes measured in trials

Method(s)

- Systematic review

Linked Studies



Related Links

    No related links