A core outcome set for eczema treatment by Traditional Chinese medicine

Objectives: This study aimed to reach consensus on the COS for eczema treatment by Traditional Chinese medicine.

Methods: A steering group of researchers and clinicians will guide the COS development. 6 stakeholder groups are involved: patients, Traditional Chinese medicine doctor, physician, nurses, research worker and drug regulatory authorities. A 1:1 ratio of patients: healthcare professionals are aimed for. The initial list of candidate items will be obtained by combining three data sets: (1) a systematic review of the literature, (2) eczema patients who have received TCM treatment and (3) an online healthcare professional (HCP) item generation survey. To reach consensus on the COS, 3 anonymous online Delphi rounds are then planned together with 1 face-to-face consensus meetings.

Discussion: A COS in this field has the potential to allow fast-tracking recommendations for application in research and clinical practice.

Contributors

Principal investigator: Li Xin, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Ongoing
Date: January 2022 - 2025
Funding source(s): None


Health Area

Disease Category: Skin

Disease Name: Eczema

Target Population

Age Range: 18 - 120

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Traditional Chinese Medicine

Stakeholders Involved

- Clinical experts
- Conference participants
- Consumers (patients)
- Journal editors
- Methodologists
- Patient/ support group representatives
- Policy makers
- Researchers

Study Type

- COS for clinical trials or clinical research
- COS for practice

Method(s)

- Consensus meeting
- Delphi process
- Interview
- Survey
- Systematic review

(1) Build the COS pool: a systematic review of the literature, eczema patients who have received TCM treatment and an online healthcare professional (HCP) item generation survey; (2) 3 anonymous online Delphi rounds; (3) face-to-face consensus meetings.

Linked Studies

    No related studies


Related Links

    No related links