A qualitative study of experiencing cauda equina syndrome and its aftercare in the UK

Study design
Qualitative, semi structured interviews.

Objectives
Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a neurological emergency that can cause permanent disability to the lower limbs, including pain, weakness, and bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. There is little evidence on the lived experience of patients with different severities of CES. This study sought to address this.

Setting
The interviews were conducted with persons who had experienced CES and been operated on for this condition in the UK.

Methods
A sampling frame was used on a pre-existing database to select a maximum variation sample. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis supported by NVivo.

Results
Data saturation was achieved with 22 patients (12 female, 10 male) of whom 10 had CES-incomplete and 12 had CES-complete. Average age was 46 years and time since the operation was 62 months. Most interviews took place at the patients’ home or workplace. Data analysis identified 4 main data themes: (1) Varying priorities of physical health; (2) A fragmented healthcare service; (3) The process of adjustment; and 4) Anticipatory anxiety and diminished sense of self-worth.

Conclusion
The identified themes confirm that CES can be a chronic condition, which requires holistic support to address the long-term outcomes. This highlights the importance of using the Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS) in CES research studies to record these outcomes.

Contributors

Nisaharan Srikandarajah, Simon Clark, Martin Wilby, Tony Marson, Adam Noble

Publication

Journal: Spinal Cord
Volume: 63
Issue:
Pages: 426 - 431
Year: 2025
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-025-01097-7

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s):


Health Area

Disease Category: Neurology, Orthopaedics & trauma

Disease Name: Cauda equina syndrome

Target Population

Age Range: 18 - 120

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Any

Stakeholders Involved

- Consumers (patients)

Study Type

- Patient perspectives

Method(s)

- Interview
- Semi structured discussion