Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute's Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee held a clinical trials planning meeting (September 2011) to identify a core symptom set to be assessed across oncology trials for the purposes of better understanding treatment efficacy and toxicity and to facilitate cross-study comparisons. We report the results of an evidence-synthesis and consensus-building effort that culminated in recommendations for core symptoms to be measured in adult cancer clinical trials that include a patient-reported outcome (PRO). METHODS: We used a data-driven, consensus-building process. A panel of experts, including patient representatives, conducted a systematic review of the literature (2001-2011) and analyzed six large datasets. Results were reviewed at a multistakeholder meeting, and a final set was derived emphasizing symptom prevalence across diverse cancer populations, impact on health outcomes and quality of life, and attribution to either disease or anticancer treatment. RESULTS: We recommend that a core set of 12 symptoms--specifically fatigue, insomnia, pain, anorexia (appetite loss), dyspnea, cognitive problems, anxiety (includes worry), nausea, depression (includes sadness), sensory neuropathy, constipation, and diarrhea--be considered for inclusion in clinical trials where a PRO is measured. Inclusion of symptoms and other patient-reported endpoints should be well justified, hypothesis driven, and meaningful to patients. CONCLUSIONS: This core set will promote consistent assessment of common and clinically relevant disease- and treatment-related symptoms across cancer trials. As such, it provides a foundation to support data harmonization and continued efforts to enhance measurement of patient-centered outcomes in cancer clinical trials and observational studies.

Contributors

Reeve, B. B. Mitchell, S. A. Dueck, A. C. Basch, E. Cella, D. Reilly, C. M. Minasian, L. M. Denicoff, A. M. O'Mara, A. M. Fisch, M. J. Chauhan, C. Aaronson, N. K. Coens, C. Bruner, D. W.

Publication

Journal: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume: 106
Issue: 7
Pages: -
Year: 2014
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju129

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Not Applicable
Date: September 2011
Funding source(s): Not stated


Health Area

Disease Category: Cancer

Disease Name: Cancer

Target Population

Age Range: 18 - 100

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Not specified

Stakeholders Involved

- Clinical experts
- Patient/ support group representatives
- Researchers

Study Type

- Systematic review of outcome measures/measurement instruments
- COS Patient Reported Outcomes

Method(s)

- Consensus meeting
- Other
- Systematic review

Other: Analysis of datasets