Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour (COSIOL): An international multi-stakeholder Delphi study

Objective: To develop a set of core outcomes to be minimally reported in trials on induction of labour.

Design: Two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting.

Population: Four Stakeholder groups: midwives, obstetricians, neonatologists, and women’s representatives.

Methods: Protocol registered with COMET (registration number: 695). Stakeholders rated reported outcomes for importance (1-limited to 9-critical). The median rating of each outcome was calculated. The consensus criteria to include outcomes were: = 70% participants rated outcomes as critical and <15% rated outcomes as limited importance. Outcomes that did not achieve consensus were taken to round two, and if still no consensus, to the final consensus meeting. Main outcome measures: Outcomes in trials of induction of labour.

Results: Of the 159 invited participants, 54% (86/159) completed the first round, and 83% completed the second round (71/86). The core outcome set included 28 core outcomes in four domains: Short-term maternal outcomes (n=18) – cardio-respiratory arrest, damage to internal organs, death, haemorrhage, hysterectomy, infection, intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, mode of delivery, need for more than one induction agent, oxytocin augmentation, postnatal depression, pulmonary embolus, satisfaction with care, stroke, time from induction to delivery, uterine hyperstimulation, uterine scar dehiscence/rupture; Short-term offspring outcomes (n=8) – admission to the neonatal unit, birth trauma, death, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy/need for therapeutic hypothermia, meconium aspiration syndrome, need for respiratory support, infection, seizures; Long-term maternal outcomes (n=1) – operative pelvic floor repair; Long-term offspring outcomes (n=1) – disability including neurodevelopmental delay.

Conclusion: Trials on induction of labour should include this core outcome set to standardise reporting

Contact email address: Francois.santos@doctors.org.uk

Contributors

Francois Dos Santos
Stephanie Drymiotou
Alba Antequera
Ben W Mol
Christopher Gale
Declan Devane
Janneke van't Hooft
Mark J Johnson
Matthew Hogg
Shakila Thangaratinam

Publication

Journal: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: -
Year: 2018
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15397

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Not Applicable
Date: April 2015 - September 2015
Funding source(s): None


Health Area

Disease Category: Pregnancy & childbirth

Disease Name: Induction of labour

Target Population

Age Range: 16 - 100

Sex: Female

Nature of Intervention: Other

Stakeholders Involved

- Clinical experts
- Consumers (patients)
- Patient/ support group representatives
- Consumers (caregivers)

Study Type

- COS for clinical trials or clinical research

Method(s)

- Consensus meeting
- Delphi process

Protocol registered with COMET (registration number: 695). Stakeholders rated reported outcomes for importance (1-limited to 9-critical). The median rating of each outcome was calculated. The consensus criteria to include outcomes were: = 70% participants rated outcomes as critical and <15% rated outcomes as limited importance. Outcomes that did not achieve consensus were taken to round two, and if still no consensus, to the final consensus meeting.

Linked Studies

    No related studies


Related Links

    No related links