COMET Initiative | A survey of Delphi panelists after core outcome set development revealed positive feedback and methods to facilitate panel member participation

A survey of Delphi panelists after core outcome set development revealed positive feedback and methods to facilitate panel member participation

Objectives
The objective of this study was to elicit feedback on consensus methodology used for core outcome set (COS) development.

Study Design and Setting
An online survey of international Delphi panelists participating in a recent COS for clinical research studies evaluating acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors was conducted. Panelists represented 14 countries (56% outside the United States).

Results
Seventy (92%) panelists completed the survey, including 32 researchers, 19 professional association representatives, 4 research funding representatives, and 15 ARF survivors/caregiver members. Among respondents, 91% reported that the time required to participate was appropriate and 96% were not bothered by reminders for timely response. Attributes of measurement instruments and voting results from previous rounds were evaluated differently across stakeholder groups. When measurement properties were explained in the stem of the survey question, 59 (84%) panelists (including 73% of survivors/families) correctly interpreted information about an instrument's reliability. Without a reminder in the stem, only 20 (29%) panelists (including 38% of researchers) correctly identified properties of a COS.

Conclusion
This international Delphi panel, including >20% patients/caregivers, favorably reported on feasibility of the methodology. Providing all panelists pertinent information/reminders about the project's objective at each voting round is important to informed decision making across all stakeholder groups.

Contributors

Alison E. Turnbull
Victor D. Dinglas
Lisa Aronson Friedman
Caroline M. Chessare
Kristin A. Sepúlveda
Clifton O. Bingham III
Dale M. Needham

Publication

Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume: 102
Issue:
Pages: 99 - 106
Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.06.007

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s):

Health Area

Disease Category: Other

Disease Name: N/A

Target Population

Age Range: Unknown

Sex:

Nature of Intervention:

Stakeholders Involved

- Clinical experts
- Consumers (caregivers)
- Consumers (patients)
- Funders
- Researchers

Study Type

- COS methods research

Method(s)

- Survey

An online survey of international Delphi panelists participating in a recent COS for clinical research studies evaluating acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors was conducted. Panelists represented 14 countries (56% outside the United States).