Do we need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating the management of childbirth trauma

BACKGROUND: Selecting appropriate outcomes to reflect both beneficial and harmful effects is a critical step in designing childbirth trauma trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and outcome measures reported in randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions for childbirth trauma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials were identified by searching bibliographical databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and EMBASE. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different techniques in the management of perineal lacerations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently assessed studies for inclusion, evaluated methodological quality, and extracted the relevant data. Spearman's rho correlation and multivariate linear regression analysis using the backward stepwise model were used for analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-eight randomised trials, reporting data from 20 308 women, were included. Seventeen different interventions were evaluated. Included trials reported 77 different outcomes and 50 different outcome measures. Commonly reported outcomes included pain (34 trials; 70%), wound healing (20 trials; 42%), and anorectal dysfunction (16 trials, 33%). In the multivariate analysis, no relationship was demonstrated between the quality of outcome reporting and year of publication (P = 0.31), journal impact factor (P = 0.49), and methodological quality (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Outcome reporting in childbirth trauma research is heterogeneous. Developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set in future childbirth trauma research could help address these issues. FUNDING: None. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Developing @coreoutcomes for childbirth trauma research could help to reduce #research waste.

Contributors

Pergialiotis, V. Durnea, C. Elfituri, A. Duffy, J. Doumouchtsis, S. K.

Publication

Journal: BJOG
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: -
Year: 2018
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15408

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Not Applicable
Date: - September 2017
Funding source(s): None

---

Method(s)

- Systematic review

Linked Studies

• Developing a core outcome set for female pelvic floor disorders (urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, childbirth perineal trauma and pelvic pain syndromes)
• A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
• A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery
• A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence: a call to develop a core outcome set
• An arm-based network meta-analysis on treatments for vulvar lichen sclerosus and a call for development of core outcome sets: Treatment options for vulvar lichen sclerosus
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions for posterior vaginal prolapse to aid development of a core outcome set
• A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets
• Analysis of primary and secondary outcome domains reported in randomised trials on surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. A systematic review
• Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set
• A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on stress urinary incontinence in women for the development of a Core Outcome Set: A systematic review
• Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacological management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in women; a systematic review for the development of core outcome sets (COS)
• Developing a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma: delphi survey
• Reported outcomes and outcome measures in RCTs of laparoscopic and robotic interventions for pelvic organ prolapse in women: a systematic review

Related Links

No related links