Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set

Background
Significant risk of bias and limitations in outcome selections in trials evaluating conservative treatments for the management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) have been highlighted and preclude comparability of outcomes, synthesis of primary studies and high quality evidence.

Objectives
As systematic review of the reported outcomes is the first step in the process of development of a Core Outcome Set (COS), we aimed to systematically review reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) on conservative treatments for POP and develop an inventory of them for consideration as core outcome and outcome measures sets. We evaluated methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics and their associations among published RCTs.

Study Design: Systematic review of RCTs identified from the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and MEDLINE (Pubmed). RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions for the management of POP were considered for inclusion. Outcomes and outcome measures were obtained from the RCTs and an inventory was created. Outcomes were grouped in domains and themes. Methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics were evaluated and statistically analysed.

Results
Twenty-five trials (3179 women) were included and reported 31 outcomes and 50 outcome measures. Reporting rates of the outcomes investigated ranged between 4% and 56%. The most commonly reported outcome domains were patient reported symptoms, stage of POP expressed as POP-Q stage, and quality of life. Univariate analysis demonstrated no significant correlations of methodological and outcome reporting parameters.

Conclusions
There is a need to increase comparability of RCTs. Reporting standardized outcomes included in a COS for conservative interventions for POP will facilitate the comparability across RCTs. While the process of developing COS is in progress, we propose the interim use of the three most commonly reported outcomes in each domain: patient-reported outcomes (symptom distress including bowel and urinary symptoms, sexual function), stage of prolapse and quality of life parameters using validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire/Health related quality of life (PFIQ-7/HRQOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ-7).

Contributors

Kimmee Khan, Maria Rada, Abdullatif Elfituri, Cornelia Betschart, Gabriele Falconi, Vasillios Pergialiotis, Jorge Milhem Haddad, Stergios Doumouchtsis

Publication

Journal: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: -
Year: 2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.028

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s):

---

Method(s)

- Systematic review

Linked Studies

• Developing a core outcome set for female pelvic floor disorders (urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, childbirth perineal trauma and pelvic pain syndromes)
• Do we need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating the management of childbirth trauma
• A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
• A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery
• A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence: a call to develop a core outcome set
• An arm-based network meta-analysis on treatments for vulvar lichen sclerosus and a call for development of core outcome sets: Treatment options for vulvar lichen sclerosus
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions for posterior vaginal prolapse to aid development of a core outcome set
• A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets
• Analysis of primary and secondary outcome domains reported in randomised trials on surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. A systematic review
• A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on stress urinary incontinence in women for the development of a Core Outcome Set: A systematic review
• Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacological management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in women; a systematic review for the development of core outcome sets (COS)
• Developing a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma: delphi survey
• Reported outcomes and outcome measures in RCTs of laparoscopic and robotic interventions for pelvic organ prolapse in women: a systematic review

Related Links

No related links