Reported outcomes and outcome measures in RCTs of laparoscopic and robotic interventions for pelvic organ prolapse in women: a systematic review

Background
Considerable variations exist in the selection and reporting of outcomes and outcome measures across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). These variations hinder the ability to conduct comprehensive analyses and limit the comparability of results regarding safety and efficacy.

Objective
To create an inventory of selected and reported outcomes and outcome measures in published RCTs evaluating laparoscopic and robotic surgical treatments for POP and to assess their variations. Additionally, we aimed to investigate methodological parameters and quality of outcome reporting in these studies.

Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted across EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed from inception to May 2025 to identify relevant RCTs. Data on study characteristics and reported outcomes were extracted and compiled. Outcomes were organized into overarching domains and sub-categorized into specific themes. We considered all RCTs on adult women in English language.

Results
Forty-five RCTs involving a total of 4566 female participants were included. Across these studies, 83 outcomes and 59 different outcome measures were identified. The most reported outcomes were duration of operation (65%), postoperative pain (45%), quality of life (45%), intraoperative blood loss (40%), and anatomical correction (40%). Twelve outcome domains were recognized, with “intraoperative technical aspects and observations” being the most comprehensive, containing 11 unique outcomes. Less frequently reported outcomes included financial cost (20%), sexual function (10%), and the cosmetic appearance of surgical wounds (5%). Outcome measures were grouped into six domains, with quality of life representing the most diverse, encompassing 24 different measures. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system emerged as the most consistently utilized outcome measure.

Contributors

Christina Pagkaki, Fenu Ediripolage, Kyriaki-Barbara Papalois, Abdullatif Elfituri, Jorge Haddad, Maria Patricia Roman, Elias Tsakos, Gabriele Falconi, Cornelia Betschart, Stergios K Doumouchtsis; CHORUS: An International Collaboration for Harmonising Outcomes, Research and Standards in Urogynaecology and Women’s Health (i-chorus.org)

Publication

Journal: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume: 318
Issue:
Pages: -
Year: 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114819

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s):

---

Method(s)

- Systematic review

Linked Studies

• Developing a core outcome set for female pelvic floor disorders (urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, childbirth perineal trauma and pelvic pain syndromes)
• Do we need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating the management of childbirth trauma
• A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
• A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on apical prolapse surgery
• A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence: a call to develop a core outcome set
• An arm-based network meta-analysis on treatments for vulvar lichen sclerosus and a call for development of core outcome sets: Treatment options for vulvar lichen sclerosus
• A systematic review of reported outcomes and outcome measures in randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions for posterior vaginal prolapse to aid development of a core outcome set
• A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets
• Analysis of primary and secondary outcome domains reported in randomised trials on surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. A systematic review
• Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set
• A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on stress urinary incontinence in women for the development of a Core Outcome Set: A systematic review
• Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacological management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in women; a systematic review for the development of core outcome sets (COS)
• Developing a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma: delphi survey

Related Links

No related links